<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SelfSelector</title>
	<atom:link href="http://selfselector.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://selfselector.co.uk</link>
	<description>Critical writing by Lorena Muñoz-Alonso</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:46:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ghost of Francesca Woodman by Lorena Muñoz-Alonso</title>
		<link>http://selfselector.co.uk/2007/03/16/the-ghost-of-francesca-woodman/#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorena Muñoz-Alonso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vectorsize.com/slfs/?p=10#comment-2194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure Rosalie, please go ahead! What Facebook group is it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure Rosalie, please go ahead! What Facebook group is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ghost of Francesca Woodman by Rosalie</title>
		<link>http://selfselector.co.uk/2007/03/16/the-ghost-of-francesca-woodman/#comment-2193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosalie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 23:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vectorsize.com/slfs/?p=10#comment-2193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello there! Would you mind if I share your blog with my facebook group?
There&#039;s a lot of people that I think would really appreciate your content. Please let me know. Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there! Would you mind if I share your blog with my facebook group?<br />
There&#8217;s a lot of people that I think would really appreciate your content. Please let me know. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gabriel Kuri’s “Classical Symmetry, Historical Data, Subjective Judgement” by michael hampton</title>
		<link>http://selfselector.co.uk/2012/10/24/gabriel-kuris-classical-symmetry-historical-data-subjective-judgement/#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael hampton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfselector.co.uk/?p=974#comment-1982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frederic Jameson&#039;s phrase &quot;late capitalism&quot; probably needs a rest, as it implies that an ideology is exhausted, or worse still overdue (at the office), even a train running behind schedule (Mussolini is not amused), whereas we can all see that despite its global paroxysm over the last 3 or 4 years, capitalism is just restructuring, en pire no doubt, but &quot;late&quot;? No. And no as in likely to come to a sudden end. It&#039;s a mutable system that can absorb any number of whammies, fall in the shit and come up smelling of roses, except those roses wont have much real scent as they are grown in unnatural conditions besides some Kenyan lake that is being bled dry, etc etc. Ask yourself, is the future going to be totalitarian or communitarian? I think the answer is a foregone conclusion. Sorry to end on such a depressing note.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frederic Jameson&#8217;s phrase &#8220;late capitalism&#8221; probably needs a rest, as it implies that an ideology is exhausted, or worse still overdue (at the office), even a train running behind schedule (Mussolini is not amused), whereas we can all see that despite its global paroxysm over the last 3 or 4 years, capitalism is just restructuring, en pire no doubt, but &#8220;late&#8221;? No. And no as in likely to come to a sudden end. It&#8217;s a mutable system that can absorb any number of whammies, fall in the shit and come up smelling of roses, except those roses wont have much real scent as they are grown in unnatural conditions besides some Kenyan lake that is being bled dry, etc etc. Ask yourself, is the future going to be totalitarian or communitarian? I think the answer is a foregone conclusion. Sorry to end on such a depressing note.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ghost of Francesca Woodman by Bernard H.Wood.</title>
		<link>http://selfselector.co.uk/2007/03/16/the-ghost-of-francesca-woodman/#comment-1978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernard H.Wood.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 08:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vectorsize.com/slfs/?p=10#comment-1978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Laura,

Your post is over a year old! but I wanted to respond.
If you are producing original work and exploring new ideas then be prepared for a lot of rejection and aggravation. By definition the audience and market-place does not exist for what you are creating. Also, there are a lot of people who are doing fine out of keeping things the way they are, for their own benefit. Vested interests in other words. 

The establishment is wary of originality because it is not what it knows and controls... It&#039;s not &quot;established&quot;.  It either doesn&#039;t understand what you are about, or doesn&#039;t want something new to threaten careers, status and reliable cash cows. This is normal. I&#039;ve often thought that the &quot;creative&quot; industries are ruined by the people that work in them.

 I&#039;m just trying to give you an idea of what you are up against.

 If you are good across a range of disciplines, that helps. The most successful people I have seen have either &quot;zig-zagged&quot; up the ladder rather than climbed straight up... or have been a Mozart at something that not everyone wants to do (or can) but is nonetheless needed. ...or who have towed the line for years, established contacts and an impressive CV, and then gone their own way.
Some in the industry consider flexibility bonus, some favour specialisation. Either direction is your choice. Frankly I don&#039;t consider that the industry gives me enough of anything to dictate *what* I do. That&#039;s *my* choice!

Prepare to be: ignored, bought out and sat on, criticised, ostracised, discriminated against, ripped off and plagiarised. Not good huh?
   Now, if creativity is just part of who you are then you may *have* to follow it or be forever restless and wondering &#039;what if?&#039; ... which is arguably a lot worse than trying and having it &quot;not work out&quot;. Something else may &quot;work out&quot; instead.

My opinion is that it all hinges on how you regard these supposed &#039;superiors&#039; that you think you *need* to validate your work, career, art or even *life*. When I started out, I put these people on pedestals and would chase the crumbs of work that they tantalised me with.  I had to go through the &#039;mill&#039; a little and learn the hard way that I was *wrong*. My creativity -whatever it&#039;s &#039;value&#039;- can exist outside of the opinions of others that I discovered were just as flawed, biased, self-centered, narcissistic, spiteful, devious, back-stabbing, fake and destructively neurotic... as the worst in any aspect of our society. 

So don&#039;t be surprised, or depressed if you have bad experiences with them. Don&#039;t even consider the same &#039;way out&#039; that Francessca did. Trust me after getting the inside view... the industry and the people in it are really, *really* not worth it. Your health, life and creativity are way too important.
 Looking back with experience I find it frightening that I ever believed different. It&#039;s almost laughable!

So: (for instance) if you want to be a film-maker: start making films ... don&#039;t wait around for someone behind a desk to &#039;validate&#039; you with a badge and a pat on the head! You can do your own thing and anything else is a bonus. Even if you want to approach the industry, the fact that you have your own thing going on makes you look more serious, professional and indeed desirable. Of course you may get asked: If you have your own thing, why do you want to work for us? Be prepared.

The pill to swalllow is that : you *may* never be a &quot;big shot&quot; by industry standards. I am not one and I may never be one. So what? What&#039;s more important the art or the prestige? You may have to support yourself by other means at least in part? So what? It&#039;s a good character builder, gets you thinking about other things, gets you real money *now* and (depending on the job) could give you useful contacts.

Does any of this help? I&#039;m just trying to convey the things that I wished I had known when in your position. These are my opinions and conclusions based upon the reality that I have seen and experienced, not just fortune-cookie philosophy. Get the (qualified) views of others too and then choose.
You can re-evaluate, modify, learn and grow as you progress. In fact you probably will.
That&#039;s life.
B.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Laura,</p>
<p>Your post is over a year old! but I wanted to respond.<br />
If you are producing original work and exploring new ideas then be prepared for a lot of rejection and aggravation. By definition the audience and market-place does not exist for what you are creating. Also, there are a lot of people who are doing fine out of keeping things the way they are, for their own benefit. Vested interests in other words. </p>
<p>The establishment is wary of originality because it is not what it knows and controls&#8230; It&#8217;s not &#8220;established&#8221;.  It either doesn&#8217;t understand what you are about, or doesn&#8217;t want something new to threaten careers, status and reliable cash cows. This is normal. I&#8217;ve often thought that the &#8220;creative&#8221; industries are ruined by the people that work in them.</p>
<p> I&#8217;m just trying to give you an idea of what you are up against.</p>
<p> If you are good across a range of disciplines, that helps. The most successful people I have seen have either &#8220;zig-zagged&#8221; up the ladder rather than climbed straight up&#8230; or have been a Mozart at something that not everyone wants to do (or can) but is nonetheless needed. &#8230;or who have towed the line for years, established contacts and an impressive CV, and then gone their own way.<br />
Some in the industry consider flexibility bonus, some favour specialisation. Either direction is your choice. Frankly I don&#8217;t consider that the industry gives me enough of anything to dictate *what* I do. That&#8217;s *my* choice!</p>
<p>Prepare to be: ignored, bought out and sat on, criticised, ostracised, discriminated against, ripped off and plagiarised. Not good huh?<br />
   Now, if creativity is just part of who you are then you may *have* to follow it or be forever restless and wondering &#8216;what if?&#8217; &#8230; which is arguably a lot worse than trying and having it &#8220;not work out&#8221;. Something else may &#8220;work out&#8221; instead.</p>
<p>My opinion is that it all hinges on how you regard these supposed &#8216;superiors&#8217; that you think you *need* to validate your work, career, art or even *life*. When I started out, I put these people on pedestals and would chase the crumbs of work that they tantalised me with.  I had to go through the &#8216;mill&#8217; a little and learn the hard way that I was *wrong*. My creativity -whatever it&#8217;s &#8216;value&#8217;- can exist outside of the opinions of others that I discovered were just as flawed, biased, self-centered, narcissistic, spiteful, devious, back-stabbing, fake and destructively neurotic&#8230; as the worst in any aspect of our society. </p>
<p>So don&#8217;t be surprised, or depressed if you have bad experiences with them. Don&#8217;t even consider the same &#8216;way out&#8217; that Francessca did. Trust me after getting the inside view&#8230; the industry and the people in it are really, *really* not worth it. Your health, life and creativity are way too important.<br />
 Looking back with experience I find it frightening that I ever believed different. It&#8217;s almost laughable!</p>
<p>So: (for instance) if you want to be a film-maker: start making films &#8230; don&#8217;t wait around for someone behind a desk to &#8216;validate&#8217; you with a badge and a pat on the head! You can do your own thing and anything else is a bonus. Even if you want to approach the industry, the fact that you have your own thing going on makes you look more serious, professional and indeed desirable. Of course you may get asked: If you have your own thing, why do you want to work for us? Be prepared.</p>
<p>The pill to swalllow is that : you *may* never be a &#8220;big shot&#8221; by industry standards. I am not one and I may never be one. So what? What&#8217;s more important the art or the prestige? You may have to support yourself by other means at least in part? So what? It&#8217;s a good character builder, gets you thinking about other things, gets you real money *now* and (depending on the job) could give you useful contacts.</p>
<p>Does any of this help? I&#8217;m just trying to convey the things that I wished I had known when in your position. These are my opinions and conclusions based upon the reality that I have seen and experienced, not just fortune-cookie philosophy. Get the (qualified) views of others too and then choose.<br />
You can re-evaluate, modify, learn and grow as you progress. In fact you probably will.<br />
That&#8217;s life.<br />
B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paulina Olowska&#8217;s &#8216;Mother 200&#8242; at Simon Lee Gallery by María DdRS</title>
		<link>http://selfselector.co.uk/2012/06/01/paulina-olowskas-mother-200-at-simon-lee-gallery/#comment-1977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[María DdRS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 23:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfselector.co.uk/?p=935#comment-1977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re welcome! Btw, nice blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome! Btw, nice blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ghost of Francesca Woodman by The Ghost of Francesca Woodman &#171; Genea Bailey&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://selfselector.co.uk/2007/03/16/the-ghost-of-francesca-woodman/#comment-1975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Ghost of Francesca Woodman &#171; Genea Bailey&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vectorsize.com/slfs/?p=10#comment-1975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] via The Ghost of Francesca Woodman. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via The Ghost of Francesca Woodman. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seb Patane: The Hidden Alchemist by Greenwich Village, 8am &#171; AMOEN</title>
		<link>http://selfselector.co.uk/2010/03/16/seb-patane-the-hidden-alchemist/#comment-1965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greenwich Village, 8am &#171; AMOEN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfselector.co.uk/?p=289#comment-1965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] post is based on the above sound work made by Seb Patane for A Moment of Eternal Noise from field recordings made in the Summer of 2011 in New York. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post is based on the above sound work made by Seb Patane for A Moment of Eternal Noise from field recordings made in the Summer of 2011 in New York. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paulina Olowska&#8217;s &#8216;Mother 200&#8242; at Simon Lee Gallery by Lorena Muñoz-Alonso</title>
		<link>http://selfselector.co.uk/2012/06/01/paulina-olowskas-mother-200-at-simon-lee-gallery/#comment-1961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorena Muñoz-Alonso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfselector.co.uk/?p=935#comment-1961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the tip, Maria!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip, Maria!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paulina Olowska&#8217;s &#8216;Mother 200&#8242; at Simon Lee Gallery by María DdRS</title>
		<link>http://selfselector.co.uk/2012/06/01/paulina-olowskas-mother-200-at-simon-lee-gallery/#comment-1960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[María DdRS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfselector.co.uk/?p=935#comment-1960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;Granny&#039; represents part of one of William Eggleston photos: http://www.masters-of-photography.com/images/full/eggleston/eggleston_woman_on_swing.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Granny&#8217; represents part of one of William Eggleston photos: <a href="http://www.masters-of-photography.com/images/full/eggleston/eggleston_woman_on_swing.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.masters-of-photography.com/images/full/eggleston/eggleston_woman_on_swing.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gonzalo Lebrija. Life Isn&#8217;t Worth a Thing by michael hampton</title>
		<link>http://selfselector.co.uk/2012/07/17/gonzalo-lebrija-life-isnt-worth-a-thing/#comment-1926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael hampton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfselector.co.uk/?p=950#comment-1926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course as we are life, then it is impossible to stand outside of life and evaluate it, therefore no great seriousness can be attached to a value judgement declaring that life is worthless or worth less than nothing. When life itself is deified and indeed reified then we must accept that no bid can secure either its quiddity or meaning, since our fleeting bio-molecular existences are validated by what we choose to do, to assert, avoid, negate, join, celebrate etc. But in themselves these are just ontological positions. Naturally from the perspective of death, or the dead, then life might be weighed, appraised, sentimentalised, but as Wittgenstein put it so memorably &quot;death is not an event in life&quot;. Without doubt, the burden of making something of life, giving it value is the only truly worthwhile task, so ironically even though life might appear to have zero value in our corrupt and degraded times, this work still goes on, and the artist if he/she is worth 
critical consideration must pass a test to determine if they have addressed the supreme difficulty of existence, whilst still keeping their options open with regard to life&#039;s continuity via practice and its artifices.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course as we are life, then it is impossible to stand outside of life and evaluate it, therefore no great seriousness can be attached to a value judgement declaring that life is worthless or worth less than nothing. When life itself is deified and indeed reified then we must accept that no bid can secure either its quiddity or meaning, since our fleeting bio-molecular existences are validated by what we choose to do, to assert, avoid, negate, join, celebrate etc. But in themselves these are just ontological positions. Naturally from the perspective of death, or the dead, then life might be weighed, appraised, sentimentalised, but as Wittgenstein put it so memorably &#8220;death is not an event in life&#8221;. Without doubt, the burden of making something of life, giving it value is the only truly worthwhile task, so ironically even though life might appear to have zero value in our corrupt and degraded times, this work still goes on, and the artist if he/she is worth<br />
critical consideration must pass a test to determine if they have addressed the supreme difficulty of existence, whilst still keeping their options open with regard to life&#8217;s continuity via practice and its artifices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
